Monthly Archive for August, 2005

Reasons for developing paid blog post ethics

In a couple of recent posts on this site (here and here) and on other sites (here, here and here), the issue of bloggers reviewing for reward has come up. Discussions have varied but most people seem to agree that if a blogger reviews an item but fails to reveal any benefit accruing to them for the review that there is an ethical problem there and that the bloggers readership are being mislead.

Who cares? Why is this important? This is important because traditional marketing is changing and is starting to embrace blogs. Up until now, marketing has been broadcast in nature - marketers interrupt our television viewing with ads, they interrupt our skyline with billboards, they interrupt our Internet experience with banner ads and email marketing.

However, we are getting better at avoiding ads - both technically and subconsciously. On the technical side, we have the likes of TiVo and Sky+ to help us skip over the ads on tv, we have spam filters and Adblock to help us avoid the banner ads and email and our subconscious helps with the rest. Walk down any street today, and try to remember how many billboards you passed and what they were for - chances are you’ll remember very few, if any.

What does this have to do with blogging? Blogs are a trusted medium - as we read someone’s blog, we develop a relationship with that person. We can converse with them, we come to know them, and largely, we trust them - they become friends.

And as Robert Scoble and Shel Israel noted in Naked Conversations:

Our friends are more influential than any advertising or marketing campaign—always have been and always will be. They influence what we watch, read and wear; where we live and travel

Word-of-mouth marketing perpetuates because of our desire to tell people when we find something new. We come across something innovative and just have to tell family and friends about it. We like to be first and to have influence.

Previously - word of mouth marketing had a very limited range - but with the advent of the Internet and blogs in particular, word of mouth marketing and conversations have gone global. For instance, Skype used instant messaging and blogs to market their product and they achieved 25 million downloads just 19 months after starting up. Firefox reached 25 million downloads less than four months after launching exclusively from a blog!

Marketers are having to adapt to meet this change and they are adapting - ergo Damien’s original question about using bloggers for product reviews. More and more we will see bloggers being used to push review products - hence the importance of the original discussion and the need to agree the ethics around ‘paid’ blog posts.

UPDATE:
I see Jeff Jarvis has blogged about blog posts for hire as well and he also recommends disclosure.

MySQL 5.0 looking good

MySQL is an open source database engine and its latest version (5.0) is due for imminent release.

According to an open letter :”open letter(from MySQL’s founders)”:http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/news/article_925.html from MySQL’s founders David Axmark & Michael “Monty” Widenius - new features in v5.0 include stored procedures, triggers and views.

The lack of stored procedures, triggers and views in MySQL to-date has held it back from being considered on the same level as other RDBMSs such as MS SQL Server and Oracle. Hopefully, this release, when it comes, will enable MySQL to be considered for large db projects and will help drive down price in this area.

A development copy of 5.0 is available for download :”download(MySQL 5.0 download site)”:http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.0.html

UPDATE:
I see the Open Source database market is growing in size and importance

Linknotes plugin

Through Craig’s site I came across a plugin which allows you to make links in your blog posts appear like footnotes - the plugin is called Linknotes and was coded by Jeremy Curry.

Installation is a snap (as you’d expect from any WordPress plugin) but usage is a little clunky, compared to normal links (simply click on the Link quicktag in the Write Post page and enter the uri) whereas in the Linknotes plugin you have to format your text appropriately. Someone left a comment on Jeremy’s site to say he had made a Quicktag for the plugin - if I can find out how he did, I’ll post that here as well.

To see how this works - I have rewritten my first paragraph above using the plugin:
Through Craig’s site :”Craig’s site”:http://nuclearmoose.com/archives/2005/08/07/wp-linknotes-this-is-freakin-fantastic/ I came across a plugin which allows you to make links in your blog posts appear like footnotes - the plugin is called Linknotes :”Linknotes”:http://jeremycurry.com/archives/2005/08/07/linknotes/ and was coded by Jeremy Curry.

UPDATE:
I found Podz tutorial on how to make Quicktags here :”here”:http://www.tamba2.org.uk/wordpress/quicktags/ and made my own Quicktag for this plugin - now it works really well!

What do people prefer - links within the text or Linknote links?

UPDATE2:
I just got an email from Jeremy, the developer of Linknotes:

Hey,
I just added quicktags to the plugin, and it doesn’t require you to replace, or edit any files. Just download v0.3. Thanks for comments, and I hope you like the plugin!

Good job Jeremy, thanks for responding so quickly. I downloaded v0.3 as advised and while the buttons appear, they don’t appear to function for me :-(

Blog posts for sale II

In reply to my post on Blog posts for sale, Michele said

The real matter that needs to be resolved is not whether the reviewer keeps the product or not but whether the promoter is willing to accept that not all reviews are going to be positive and that they do not expect them to be so ie. they are not bribing people to give them positive reviews

That is the key.

So what Michele is saying is that bribery for a review is alright but bribery for a positive review is not. While Michele’s is definitely an interesting perspective it is certainly not one that I would subscribe to.

I think Fergal put it very well in the comments on my last post when he said

it’s easy to honestly review something you’ve paid your own money for, but when someone else is covering the cost, you’ve got some sort of obligation (especially if you want the cost to be covered again next time). and sometimes that obligation seems more important than your obligation to your readers.

And that, in my humble opinion, is the key.

Accepting payment for a review by definition colours your perception of the product - disclosure of that payment to your readership is the best way to allow them to take this into account when reading your review and return of the goods after the review period removes a lot of the obligation that Fergal talks about in his comment.

Blog posts for sale?

Damien has raised the interesting issue of using bloggers for product reviews and knowing that I am a business blogging consultant, he has asked for my opinion.

This is a very tricky question Damien - on the one hand, as a blogger and a techie, I love new toys. I have a homer Simpsonesque tendency to drool and go all silly over any shiny new kit, so the blogger in me says “yes, please - send on all shiny new kit for testing please - my address is just there on the right!”

And as a business blogging consultant, I would definitely be advising clients to start a blog about their new products and/or start some blogging buzz by having a select few bloggers try out the new product - witness the great PR Boeing received when it brought a group of bloggers and journalists on a flight to try out its new inflight Internet connectivity here, here and here.

However, I remember reading an article recently (of course, I can’t find the link now!) where the author was bemoaning the lack of real reviews available any more. He was saying that reviews nowadays are nearly all scoring 4 out of 5 or 5 out of 5 for the products they review - the thinking being that the reviewer is tainted by having received the “shiny new kit” alluded to in the second paragraph.

What is the best way to avoid this? I’m not sure, but I think if bloggers are reviewing new kit, they need to disclose if they received a free review copy (and preferably return it after the review period is over) - this would go some way to ensuring that bias is removed from the process.

Michele has also responded to Damien’s post here.

Google refuses to talk to CNET News.com!

I was reading a story on CNET News.com about how both Google and MSN’s search results appear to differ in their own favour on searches about the Google and MSN legal battle.

When I reached the end of the story I saw:

(Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with CNET News.com reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story.)

Sorry, what?

“We don’t like you so we’re not talking to you?” I haven’t heard that one since my school days!

God almighty guys, grow up will you?

UPDATE:
I see Mark Jen spotted this and Mark as well




Tom Raftery’s Social Media is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!