<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another device?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-115982</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-115982</guid>
		<description>I can understand not wanting to carry around another device. Mobile devices are on a continuing converging path however, so I don't think it will be too long before we have a PDA with Kindle's features.  Electronic readers do have the potential to save a lot of resources however, so it would be nice to see them become accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand not wanting to carry around another device. Mobile devices are on a continuing converging path however, so I don&#8217;t think it will be too long before we have a PDA with Kindle&#8217;s features.  Electronic readers do have the potential to save a lot of resources however, so it would be nice to see them become accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shopping Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-115446</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopping Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-115446</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with you Tom, there are lots and lots of gadgets these days that can do what Kindle can do (iPod being one of the many). IMO, its just a waste of money. If they want to venture in the gadget industry, they might as well come up with one that competes with those that are currently available in the market, or they could provide one that have more features, uses, etc. Anyway, thanks for sharing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with you Tom, there are lots and lots of gadgets these days that can do what Kindle can do (iPod being one of the many). IMO, its just a waste of money. If they want to venture in the gadget industry, they might as well come up with one that competes with those that are currently available in the market, or they could provide one that have more features, uses, etc. Anyway, thanks for sharing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Stephen &#124; HD BizBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112839</link>
		<dc:creator>@Stephen &#124; HD BizBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112839</guid>
		<description>I agree on the multitude of devices, can't we just have two? One phone and &lt;a href="http://hdbizblog.com/blog/2007/07/01/the-iphone-killer/"&gt;one that does everything else?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the multitude of devices, can&#8217;t we just have two? One phone and <a href="http://hdbizblog.com/blog/2007/07/01/the-iphone-killer/">one that does everything else?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M. Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112698</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M. Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112698</guid>
		<description>I don't think I could read a whole book on an iPod screen though. Plus they aren't physicaly large enough for easy reading. And then there is battery life, keeping that screen fully-lit for hours on end as you read. eInk is not just a bit more DPI, it is an order of magnitude better to read by. It isn't great for moving images though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I could read a whole book on an iPod screen though. Plus they aren&#8217;t physicaly large enough for easy reading. And then there is battery life, keeping that screen fully-lit for hours on end as you read. eInk is not just a bit more DPI, it is an order of magnitude better to read by. It isn&#8217;t great for moving images though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112695</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112695</guid>
		<description>Sure Shane, but I can do that with the iPod already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Shane, but I can do that with the iPod already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112694</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/another-device/#comment-112694</guid>
		<description>It's an extra device but if it's as good as Jeff claims then it would mean not having to carry a book(s) around with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an extra device but if it&#8217;s as good as Jeff claims then it would mean not having to carry a book(s) around with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
