<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CO2 emissions vs income</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Daan Vreugdenhil</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-115032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Daan Vreugdenhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-115032</guid>
		<description>One of the most urgent and yet effective measure of slowing down the release of CO2 in the admosphere is by effectively protecting forests and coral reefs in nature reserves and protected areas and thus preventing them from going up in CO2 blasting flames. This has been elaborated at my blog http://naturalplaces.blogspot.com/ and on our webpage http://www.adopt-a-ranger.org/carbon_offset.htm and http://www.birdlist.org/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=4
 Moreover, this would be the only hope of preserving maybe 50% of the species on earth in the course of this century. So you may like it even if you don't believe in global warming. It is a measure well worth taking!

To achieve this the world's shortage of park rangers, estimated at over 100,000 in developing countries needs to be addressed. Currently no government or conservation organization in the world addresses this problem. that is why the Adopt A Ranger Foundation has been created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most urgent and yet effective measure of slowing down the release of CO2 in the admosphere is by effectively protecting forests and coral reefs in nature reserves and protected areas and thus preventing them from going up in CO2 blasting flames. This has been elaborated at my blog <a href="http://naturalplaces.blogspot.com/">http://naturalplaces.blogspot.com/</a> and on our webpage <a href="http://www.adopt-a-ranger.org/carbon_offset.htm">http://www.adopt-a-ranger.org/carbon_offset.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.birdlist.org/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=4">http://www.birdlist.org/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=4</a><br />
 Moreover, this would be the only hope of preserving maybe 50% of the species on earth in the course of this century. So you may like it even if you don&#8217;t believe in global warming. It is a measure well worth taking!</p>
<p>To achieve this the world&#8217;s shortage of park rangers, estimated at over 100,000 in developing countries needs to be addressed. Currently no government or conservation organization in the world addresses this problem. that is why the Adopt A Ranger Foundation has been created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113447</guid>
		<description>Tom,
Don't forget though, the W man doesn't by far represent the rest of us Yanks. The first thing he did when he lurked into office was pull us out of the Kyoto treaty - a move that showed many of us what we were in for over the next few years. 

Many US States have given the proverbial raspberry, and gone ahead and made their own tighter rules for emissions standards despite what the oil folks would like to pose as regulations :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
Don&#8217;t forget though, the W man doesn&#8217;t by far represent the rest of us Yanks. The first thing he did when he lurked into office was pull us out of the Kyoto treaty - a move that showed many of us what we were in for over the next few years. </p>
<p>Many US States have given the proverbial raspberry, and gone ahead and made their own tighter rules for emissions standards despite what the oil folks would like to pose as regulations <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 73man</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113436</link>
		<dc:creator>73man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113436</guid>
		<description>Tom, it is not interactive but http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=311 is also worth a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, it is not interactive but <a href="http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=311">http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=311</a> is also worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113417</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113417</guid>
		<description>Hans, thanks for stopping by and commenting. Apologies for not doing your software justice in its ability to properly tell this story.

However, when I follow your suggestion and put CO2 per capita on the y-axis and time on the x-axis I find it difficult to display the large differences between the countries emissions. 

If I use the log of the CO2, the data are compressed and if I use linear data, the y-axis goes to a maximum value of 180 for some reason. I don't know how to reduce this to something more meaningful (for these 4 selected countries) like 30, for example.

Hopefully you can help with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans, thanks for stopping by and commenting. Apologies for not doing your software justice in its ability to properly tell this story.</p>
<p>However, when I follow your suggestion and put CO2 per capita on the y-axis and time on the x-axis I find it difficult to display the large differences between the countries emissions. </p>
<p>If I use the log of the CO2, the data are compressed and if I use linear data, the y-axis goes to a maximum value of 180 for some reason. I don&#8217;t know how to reduce this to something more meaningful (for these 4 selected countries) like 30, for example.</p>
<p>Hopefully you can help with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badoo</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113415</link>
		<dc:creator>Badoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113415</guid>
		<description>Well.. thats really sad :S i think bush is crazy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well.. thats really sad :S i think bush is crazy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Rosling</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113413</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Rosling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/co2-emissions-vs-income/#comment-113413</guid>
		<description>But you show GNP/capita on Y axis and CO2 per capitaas colour. do revise and show CO2 per capita on Y axis and tiem on x axis and size as total population and colour as  something elose, regions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you show GNP/capita on Y axis and CO2 per capitaas colour. do revise and show CO2 per capita on Y axis and tiem on x axis and size as total population and colour as  something elose, regions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
