<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise wikis reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Fulkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116338</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Fulkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116338</guid>
		<description>@Glade, 

Yes, installation of MindTouch Deki Wiki, when one does not use the VMware Certified image, was once difficult; however, MindTouch now provides RPMs for all major Linux distros, you can find these here: http://wiki.mindtouch.com/Official_MindTouch_Deki_Wiki_Installation_Guides . With the RPMS and the our install guides installation is a snap. 

As long as I'm commenting again, I'll reiterate since this post was never updated: MindTouch Deki Wiki does support groups, both internal and external (LDAP/AD). Moreover, MindTouch Deki Wiki provides the most granular permissioning with 64bit user roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glade, </p>
<p>Yes, installation of MindTouch Deki Wiki, when one does not use the VMware Certified image, was once difficult; however, MindTouch now provides RPMs for all major Linux distros, you can find these here: <a href="http://wiki.mindtouch.com/Official_MindTouch_Deki_Wiki_Installation_Guides">http://wiki.mindtouch.com/Official_MindTouch_Deki_Wiki_Installation_Guides</a> . With the RPMS and the our install guides installation is a snap. </p>
<p>As long as I&#8217;m commenting again, I&#8217;ll reiterate since this post was never updated: MindTouch Deki Wiki does support groups, both internal and external (LDAP/AD). Moreover, MindTouch Deki Wiki provides the most granular permissioning with 64bit user roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David E. Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116299</link>
		<dc:creator>David E. Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116299</guid>
		<description>Glade,

Thanks for reviewing PBwiki. Our business offering includes the first three seats for free and seats after that at $8/user/mo. So five seats should be $16/mo for you and comes with 10GB, not 10MB. Email sales@pbwiki.com if you're having any issues with getting set up and we'll take care of you right away.

Cheers,
 David Weekly (Founder &#38; CEO of PBwiki)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glade,</p>
<p>Thanks for reviewing PBwiki. Our business offering includes the first three seats for free and seats after that at $8/user/mo. So five seats should be $16/mo for you and comes with 10GB, not 10MB. Email <a href="mailto:sales@pbwiki.com">sales@pbwiki.com</a> if you&#8217;re having any issues with getting set up and we&#8217;ll take care of you right away.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
 David Weekly (Founder &amp; CEO of PBwiki)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glade</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116286</link>
		<dc:creator>Glade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116286</guid>
		<description>I have been researching for some time, wiki's for our business. I have set up trial accounts at SAAS wiki providers, set up open sources wikis on our webhost (PHPWiki, WikkaWiki, TikiWiki). Here is what i've found so far:

The open source solutions, such as those offered by our webhost, are clunky and way over the top. Way to many functions and not user friendly for reducing learning curves for new users. Others, such as Twiki and DekiWiki were "intense" to install...it would take me days to complete it, and then to manage all the upgrades to servers, databases etc. There really wasn't a good option.

SAAS offerings: 
Looked at www.pbwiki.com, www.brainkeeper.com, www.wetpaint.com, www.atlassian.com, www.wikispaces.com and www.centraldesktop.com.

www.pbwiki.com: good function and easy to use, and I liked it. The problem that I ran into, is the storage space. The website states 10GB, but after signing up, they only really offer 10MB. The software is great, but 10MB of storage makes it useless. If you want more storage space...you have to pay per GB and it gets expensive...really fast. 

www.brainkeeper.com: I really liked as well. Biggest downside is that making the wiki public, or having a portion public is not possible. I need that for the support section of our wiki. Still researching this though.

I am still considering trying out a few others, but wikispaces is just spendy for us, as we're only going to have a limited number of users. Again, storage space is an issue with centraldesktop...get spendy quickly. Going to look into wetpaint...but security of the entire wiki seems that it might pose a problem.

In short, the option in the SAAS arena for small businesses, with few users and reasonable storage space are few. Where is the one that offers 10GB of space (reasonable), a few users 3-5, and is competitively priced ($15-$20) a month? Any suggestions.

Note: Thanks Aaron Fulkerson for the tip on http://wik.is. I really liked what I saw in DekiWiki...but installation was a straight up test of stamina and determination...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been researching for some time, wiki&#8217;s for our business. I have set up trial accounts at SAAS wiki providers, set up open sources wikis on our webhost (PHPWiki, WikkaWiki, TikiWiki). Here is what i&#8217;ve found so far:</p>
<p>The open source solutions, such as those offered by our webhost, are clunky and way over the top. Way to many functions and not user friendly for reducing learning curves for new users. Others, such as Twiki and DekiWiki were &#8220;intense&#8221; to install&#8230;it would take me days to complete it, and then to manage all the upgrades to servers, databases etc. There really wasn&#8217;t a good option.</p>
<p>SAAS offerings:<br />
Looked at <a href="http://www.pbwiki.com">http://www.pbwiki.com</a>, <a href="http://www.brainkeeper.com">http://www.brainkeeper.com</a>, <a href="http://www.wetpaint.com">http://www.wetpaint.com</a>, <a href="http://www.atlassian.com">http://www.atlassian.com</a>, <a href="http://www.wikispaces.com">http://www.wikispaces.com</a> and <a href="http://www.centraldesktop.com">http://www.centraldesktop.com</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbwiki.com">http://www.pbwiki.com</a>: good function and easy to use, and I liked it. The problem that I ran into, is the storage space. The website states 10GB, but after signing up, they only really offer 10MB. The software is great, but 10MB of storage makes it useless. If you want more storage space&#8230;you have to pay per GB and it gets expensive&#8230;really fast. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.brainkeeper.com">http://www.brainkeeper.com</a>: I really liked as well. Biggest downside is that making the wiki public, or having a portion public is not possible. I need that for the support section of our wiki. Still researching this though.</p>
<p>I am still considering trying out a few others, but wikispaces is just spendy for us, as we&#8217;re only going to have a limited number of users. Again, storage space is an issue with centraldesktop&#8230;get spendy quickly. Going to look into wetpaint&#8230;but security of the entire wiki seems that it might pose a problem.</p>
<p>In short, the option in the SAAS arena for small businesses, with few users and reasonable storage space are few. Where is the one that offers 10GB of space (reasonable), a few users 3-5, and is competitively priced ($15-$20) a month? Any suggestions.</p>
<p>Note: Thanks Aaron Fulkerson for the tip on <a href="http://wik.is">http://wik.is</a>. I really liked what I saw in DekiWiki&#8230;but installation was a straight up test of stamina and determination&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasad</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116262</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116262</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I 1000% agree with Tom regarding the problems with Confluence.
I worked on Confluence for atleast 1 full year trying to make sense 
of its complexity. 

I have no clue why they made the architecture so complicated and so unintuitive.  Possible reason could be "Business" with "Open Source Tag".  I hear they are making lot of money, but I dont find much of interest to work with that. 

Their customer service  - I had pain......
The Team is so much distributed --- I felt Atlassian is not a company but a million sub-companies taking their shares on the name of "OPEN SOURCE" "FREE" tags all the way. I think they should come up with more professional commercial wiki solution than what they are today.
I see least commitment. Their forums - Horrible. No replies. 

Its back end is bad...I tried linking it to MySql, it doesnot scale up at all. They dont help either, but they demand upfront.

I need to try out PBWiki. 
Of all, Twiki, Jotspot, PmWiki, PhpWiki, MediaWiki, Confluence 
I liked simple PmWiki and PhpWiki. Currenly I am developing my own wiki for my needs.

Prasad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I 1000% agree with Tom regarding the problems with Confluence.<br />
I worked on Confluence for atleast 1 full year trying to make sense<br />
of its complexity. </p>
<p>I have no clue why they made the architecture so complicated and so unintuitive.  Possible reason could be &#8220;Business&#8221; with &#8220;Open Source Tag&#8221;.  I hear they are making lot of money, but I dont find much of interest to work with that. </p>
<p>Their customer service  - I had pain&#8230;&#8230;<br />
The Team is so much distributed &#8212; I felt Atlassian is not a company but a million sub-companies taking their shares on the name of &#8220;OPEN SOURCE&#8221; &#8220;FREE&#8221; tags all the way. I think they should come up with more professional commercial wiki solution than what they are today.<br />
I see least commitment. Their forums - Horrible. No replies. </p>
<p>Its back end is bad&#8230;I tried linking it to MySql, it doesnot scale up at all. They dont help either, but they demand upfront.</p>
<p>I need to try out PBWiki.<br />
Of all, Twiki, Jotspot, PmWiki, PhpWiki, MediaWiki, Confluence<br />
I liked simple PmWiki and PhpWiki. Currenly I am developing my own wiki for my needs.</p>
<p>Prasad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ McKee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Running Confluence on port 80 or 443 using mod_proxy_ajp</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116179</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ McKee &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Running Confluence on port 80 or 443 using mod_proxy_ajp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116179</guid>
		<description>[...] I use Confluence a lot, and think despite some of its failings in the UI department (Although they are being addressed as version 2.8 shows) its a excellent Enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I use Confluence a lot, and think despite some of its failings in the UI department (Although they are being addressed as version 2.8 shows) its a excellent Enterprise [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116158</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116158</guid>
		<description>Long time reader first time poster (I think.. are we on air... :) 

We've been using Confluence for about two years now and it's going great. This is not to say that is not without its issues, and you have addressed them very well here, but overall, I think if you had a bit more time perhaps, from a systems &#38; services management point of view I fell it is quite excellent (not withstanding silly UI issues).

We have found that Confluence works best when users are managed though Active Directory, eDirectory or Open LDAP, i.e. any directory service etc and allows (in the case of eDirectory anyhow) us to manage group permissions on the fly using dynamic groups. Don't bother using its own user db, its too much hassle and I don't want yet another web admin interface to add more users and try and sync accounts, its too messy. But Confluence is aimed at the Enterprise market more so than other WIKI software and I think its fair to assume that most enterprises will have some type of directory service somewhere.

Take up was slow, and in fact has not been a 100% or near, but I think a lot of that has to do with our dislike of writing things down and not having a sharing and caring mentality rather than the software even withs its weird UI.

I am beginning to form the opinion that confluence is probably best as a developer tool, given its close integration with Jira. That being said it can perform quite well as an enterprise wiki. 

On the bright side, I must blog a howto on this myself, you can use apaches mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy if you have the time to configure it, to allow it to coexist on port 80/443 for all to access, but as you said you had a short amount of time and this is again not ideal for every setup. (Why should you have to add modules if you have enterprise software...)

Finally, another wiki/collab software, and one to watch out for, is Jive Software Clearspace (They also produce an excellent Jabber server)... if only Confluence had some of its features and vice versa, I am sure you would have been happy. Best of luck in Spain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time reader first time poster (I think.. are we on air&#8230; <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been using Confluence for about two years now and it&#8217;s going great. This is not to say that is not without its issues, and you have addressed them very well here, but overall, I think if you had a bit more time perhaps, from a systems &amp; services management point of view I fell it is quite excellent (not withstanding silly UI issues).</p>
<p>We have found that Confluence works best when users are managed though Active Directory, eDirectory or Open LDAP, i.e. any directory service etc and allows (in the case of eDirectory anyhow) us to manage group permissions on the fly using dynamic groups. Don&#8217;t bother using its own user db, its too much hassle and I don&#8217;t want yet another web admin interface to add more users and try and sync accounts, its too messy. But Confluence is aimed at the Enterprise market more so than other WIKI software and I think its fair to assume that most enterprises will have some type of directory service somewhere.</p>
<p>Take up was slow, and in fact has not been a 100% or near, but I think a lot of that has to do with our dislike of writing things down and not having a sharing and caring mentality rather than the software even withs its weird UI.</p>
<p>I am beginning to form the opinion that confluence is probably best as a developer tool, given its close integration with Jira. That being said it can perform quite well as an enterprise wiki. </p>
<p>On the bright side, I must blog a howto on this myself, you can use apaches mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy if you have the time to configure it, to allow it to coexist on port 80/443 for all to access, but as you said you had a short amount of time and this is again not ideal for every setup. (Why should you have to add modules if you have enterprise software&#8230;)</p>
<p>Finally, another wiki/collab software, and one to watch out for, is Jive Software Clearspace (They also produce an excellent Jabber server)&#8230; if only Confluence had some of its features and vice versa, I am sure you would have been happy. Best of luck in Spain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul S.</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-116119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-116119</guid>
		<description>Just reading this now, is there any specific resources needed , or recommended for a wiki the size of the it@cork Conference. Just wondering would a wiki like these kill my shared hosting ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just reading this now, is there any specific resources needed , or recommended for a wiki the size of the it@cork Conference. Just wondering would a wiki like these kill my shared hosting <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115996</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115996</guid>
		<description>We use PB Wiki and love it but we also explored WetPaint and didn't mind that either. It's nice that it is fully customizable to mimic the design of a blog or website.

http://collegemogul.com

Check out our wiki in the Resources section!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use PB Wiki and love it but we also explored WetPaint and didn&#8217;t mind that either. It&#8217;s nice that it is fully customizable to mimic the design of a blog or website.</p>
<p><a href="http://collegemogul.com">http://collegemogul.com</a></p>
<p>Check out our wiki in the Resources section!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115991</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115991</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply on that Tom.

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply on that Tom.</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115983</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115983</guid>
		<description>I like PBwiki, but i must admit that there are others which are a little more basic...bit i like it ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like PBwiki, but i must admit that there are others which are a little more basic&#8230;bit i like it <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Maslov</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115930</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Maslov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115930</guid>
		<description>I fully share your frustrations with Confluence, but I think it is still one of the best on the market. PBWiki is pretty good too. If you did not need groups I would say that you should try Nuospace (http://www.nuospace.com), we are planning to add the groups feature  later this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully share your frustrations with Confluence, but I think it is still one of the best on the market. PBWiki is pretty good too. If you did not need groups I would say that you should try Nuospace (http://www.nuospace.com), we are planning to add the groups feature  later this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115900</guid>
		<description>Bill, the main reason for discounting Twiki was that after our experience with Confluence we wanted a hosted solution. 

The PBWiki hosted solution was familiar to us and cheaper than the hosted Twiki alternative (twiki.net).

No other reason than that tbh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, the main reason for discounting Twiki was that after our experience with Confluence we wanted a hosted solution. </p>
<p>The PBWiki hosted solution was familiar to us and cheaper than the hosted Twiki alternative (twiki.net).</p>
<p>No other reason than that tbh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115897</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115897</guid>
		<description>Tom,
You discounted Twiki but didn't elaborate on why - just wondering what did you not like about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
You discounted Twiki but didn&#8217;t elaborate on why - just wondering what did you not like about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David E. Weekly</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115881</link>
		<dc:creator>David E. Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115881</guid>
		<description>Hi! We're really glad that you found and liked PBwiki. There are obviously a lot of choices out there, particularly for behind-the-firewall installs. We face tough competition from very clever and professional people (some of whom have commented in this thread), so it's incredibly helpful for us to know what features are most important to you - knowing where you found PBwiki strong helps make sure we can emphasize those things going forward. (Of course, knowing what's not working for people is equally important!) Thanks again for your consideration of PBwiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! We&#8217;re really glad that you found and liked PBwiki. There are obviously a lot of choices out there, particularly for behind-the-firewall installs. We face tough competition from very clever and professional people (some of whom have commented in this thread), so it&#8217;s incredibly helpful for us to know what features are most important to you - knowing where you found PBwiki strong helps make sure we can emphasize those things going forward. (Of course, knowing what&#8217;s not working for people is equally important!) Thanks again for your consideration of PBwiki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Fulkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115789</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Fulkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115789</guid>
		<description>Oh! Thanks Tom. I just read that. Actually you do have groups in Deki Wiki. You can use both internal or external groups. Externally you can use LDAP, Active Directory, or even Drupal, Wordpress and some other apps for exposing groups. MindTouch's Deki Wiki is a distributed application platform that allows a site admin (presumably an IT person) hook in external apps, services, databases, auth systems, etc. Users can then organize data and systems in a manner most appropriate to them. In short, MindTouch connects teams, enterprise systems, Web2.0 apps and services. These external apps extend the platform and can be used by (even non-programmers) to create situational apps and data mashups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! Thanks Tom. I just read that. Actually you do have groups in Deki Wiki. You can use both internal or external groups. Externally you can use LDAP, Active Directory, or even Drupal, Wordpress and some other apps for exposing groups. MindTouch&#8217;s Deki Wiki is a distributed application platform that allows a site admin (presumably an IT person) hook in external apps, services, databases, auth systems, etc. Users can then organize data and systems in a manner most appropriate to them. In short, MindTouch connects teams, enterprise systems, Web2.0 apps and services. These external apps extend the platform and can be used by (even non-programmers) to create situational apps and data mashups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115788</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115788</guid>
		<description>Aaron - I looked into DekiWiki and you'll see in my point 2 in the update at the end of the post I ruled it out because of the inability to create groups for permissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron - I looked into DekiWiki and you&#8217;ll see in my point 2 in the update at the end of the post I ruled it out because of the inability to create groups for permissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Fulkerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115779</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Fulkerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115779</guid>
		<description>Strange you would not review MindTouch Deki Wiki. It's likely more widely used than all these combined. I'm curious why you ruled it out early on. There is a free and ad-free hosted option of Deki Wiki available at http://wik.is. Also, http://mindtouch.com/Technology will give you some idea of how MindTouch is very different from any of the other offerings you've looked at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange you would not review MindTouch Deki Wiki. It&#8217;s likely more widely used than all these combined. I&#8217;m curious why you ruled it out early on. There is a free and ad-free hosted option of Deki Wiki available at <a href="http://wik.is">http://wik.is</a>. Also, <a href="http://mindtouch.com/Technology">http://mindtouch.com/Technology</a> will give you some idea of how MindTouch is very different from any of the other offerings you&#8217;ve looked at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115752</guid>
		<description>I don't have the technical skills to do it myself, but I have seen some pretty outstanding deployments of confluence. However they had some serious design interventions going on and I don't know how difficult it was to tweak it all before launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the technical skills to do it myself, but I have seen some pretty outstanding deployments of confluence. However they had some serious design interventions going on and I don&#8217;t know how difficult it was to tweak it all before launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankp</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115721</link>
		<dc:creator>frankp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115721</guid>
		<description>isn't it refreshing though to see the comments of jon &#38; adman? Crazy really that sane, adult responses to discussion/criticism of a product stand out so much... I've more or less come to expect defensive aggression these days...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t it refreshing though to see the comments of jon &amp; adman? Crazy really that sane, adult responses to discussion/criticism of a product stand out so much&#8230; I&#8217;ve more or less come to expect defensive aggression these days&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose del Moral</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/enterprise-wikis-reviewed/#comment-115717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose del Moral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=1485#comment-115717</guid>
		<description>We tried several wiki systems 3 years ago. MediaWiki came out to be the best one. It manages very badly multilingual situations, though. Right now, Google does also have a very good alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tried several wiki systems 3 years ago. MediaWiki came out to be the best one. It manages very badly multilingual situations, though. Right now, Google does also have a very good alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
