<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feeds and comments - for and against&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Full vs partail feeds war erupts once more - yawn! &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-5237</link>
		<dc:creator>Full vs partail feeds war erupts once more - yawn! &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-5237</guid>
		<description>[...] Full feeds, however, allows people to read your entire article in their RSS reader without ever visiting your site. That is the format I favour and I have argued in favour of this several times in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full feeds, however, allows people to read your entire article in their RSS reader without ever visiting your site. That is the format I favour and I have argued in favour of this several times in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>Billy, that's fine and is entirely your decision. Others, however, will give me full feeds and I will subscribe to their feeds, not yours - that's my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy, that&#8217;s fine and is entirely your decision. Others, however, will give me full feeds and I will subscribe to their feeds, not yours - that&#8217;s my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy The Blogging Poet</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy The Blogging Poet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2737</guid>
		<description>So you want me to give you the whole cow when you came to borrow a cup of cream?

RSS is supposed to INCREASE traffic to a site, not give the traffic away. If a blog is usually interesting, fun, or informative then readers will come, but if they don't like what they read then why bother putting the entire post in an RSS feed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want me to give you the whole cow when you came to borrow a cup of cream?</p>
<p>RSS is supposed to INCREASE traffic to a site, not give the traffic away. If a blog is usually interesting, fun, or informative then readers will come, but if they don&#8217;t like what they read then why bother putting the entire post in an RSS feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Full Feeds or Nothing - but that's just my vote&lt;/strong&gt;

The partial vs. full feed debate is back.&#160; Duncan at Blog Herald provides an overview of the debate.&#160; 
I&#8217;ve always made my preference for full feed clear, yet I am still reading your partial feeds, Duncan :-)&#160; Admittedly, it&#38;rsquo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Full Feeds or Nothing - but that&#8217;s just my vote</strong></p>
<p>The partial vs. full feed debate is back.&nbsp; Duncan at Blog Herald provides an overview of the debate.&nbsp;<br />
I&rsquo;ve always made my preference for full feed clear, yet I am still reading your partial feeds, Duncan :-)&nbsp; Admittedly, it&amp;rsquo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Full vs Partial feed argument returns The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Full vs Partial feed argument returns The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>[...] John Roberts disagrees, and writes that partial feeds allow him to scan more quicky and then open the posts he&#8217;d like to read to read later.  Others, including James Robertson, Dave Winer (who is actually very reasonable on the argument) and Tom Raftery chime in as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Roberts disagrees, and writes that partial feeds allow him to scan more quicky and then open the posts he&#8217;d like to read to read later.  Others, including James Robertson, Dave Winer (who is actually very reasonable on the argument) and Tom Raftery chime in as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>Tom

But I did :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom</p>
<p>But I did <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>You should have said so sooner Michele - it is gone now!

Cheers,

Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have said so sooner Michele - it is gone now!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>Well as we are on the topic of feeds.. The copyright notice on yours has been annoying me for months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as we are on the topic of feeds.. The copyright notice on yours has been annoying me for months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>Not against comments. They are not enabled on my blog at this point because the Radio Userland comment server is no longer available to me, as I let my subscription lapse in anticipation of moving to WordPress... but the migration also requires moving my family's e-mail addresses, and I've been busy.

Up to you whether you take me seriously or not. The lack of comments is a bug, not a feature, I freely admit.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not against comments. They are not enabled on my blog at this point because the Radio Userland comment server is no longer available to me, as I let my subscription lapse in anticipation of moving to WordPress&#8230; but the migration also requires moving my family&#8217;s e-mail addresses, and I&#8217;ve been busy.</p>
<p>Up to you whether you take me seriously or not. The lack of comments is a bug, not a feature, I freely admit.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil801 - Geek Blog &#187; Full Text vs. Fishing for Pings - RSS Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil801 - Geek Blog &#187; Full Text vs. Fishing for Pings - RSS Feeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/feeds-and-comments-for-and-against/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>[...] There&#8217;s some back and forth about whether using full feeds is what people like. A partial result of it all was that performancing.com went full feed and I did a little dance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There&#8217;s some back and forth about whether using full feeds is what people like. A partial result of it all was that performancing.com went full feed and I did a little dance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
