<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full vs partail feeds war erupts once more - yawn!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/full-vs-partail-feeds-war-erupts-once-more-yawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/full-vs-partail-feeds-war-erupts-once-more-yawn/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/full-vs-partail-feeds-war-erupts-once-more-yawn/#comment-35709</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 07:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=584#comment-35709</guid>
		<description>Definitely in favor of full feeds! Check out http://www.fullfeeds.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely in favor of full feeds! Check out <a href="http://www.fullfeeds.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fullfeeds.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Connolly</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/full-vs-partail-feeds-war-erupts-once-more-yawn/#comment-5320</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Connolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=584#comment-5320</guid>
		<description>I &lt;strong&gt;much&lt;/strong&gt; prefer to read a full feed through my aggregator than one that merely produces a single headline and then a link to the full story.  In fact, I've removed some sites that only produce partial feeds from my reading list due to the lack of a full feed.

To me, the best sort of site for a particular subject is a &lt;a href="http://www.planetplanet.org/"&gt;planet&lt;/a&gt;, such as planet Gnome, planet SuSE or planet KDE.  This does raise the question of who controls the feeds to the planet site, but so far I've had good results with suggesting more blogs to be included in each planet site.  One subscription for me, and I get to read 20-30+ sites quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <strong>much</strong> prefer to read a full feed through my aggregator than one that merely produces a single headline and then a link to the full story.  In fact, I&#8217;ve removed some sites that only produce partial feeds from my reading list due to the lack of a full feed.</p>
<p>To me, the best sort of site for a particular subject is a <a href="http://www.planetplanet.org/">planet</a>, such as planet Gnome, planet SuSE or planet KDE.  This does raise the question of who controls the feeds to the planet site, but so far I&#8217;ve had good results with suggesting more blogs to be included in each planet site.  One subscription for me, and I get to read 20-30+ sites quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computerworld Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/full-vs-partail-feeds-war-erupts-once-more-yawn/#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>Computerworld Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=584#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Robert Scoble on full text feeds&lt;/strong&gt;

If you've read my brother's blog much in the last few years, you know how much he doesn't like partial text feeds.
Today he did another blog on why he feels that partial text feeds are bogus and why he thinks that arguments that publishers make to s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Robert Scoble on full text feeds</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve read my brother&#8217;s blog much in the last few years, you know how much he doesn&#8217;t like partial text feeds.<br />
Today he did another blog on why he feels that partial text feeds are bogus and why he thinks that arguments that publishers make to s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
