<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google censors the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: China blocks Technorati &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>China blocks Technorati &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>[...] I have posted about this topic in the past and, in my naive opinion, unless all the search engines come together to formulate a common China strategy, China will continue to pick them off one by one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have posted about this topic in the past and, in my naive opinion, unless all the search engines come together to formulate a common China strategy, China will continue to pick them off one by one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could podcasting get content through the Great Firewall of China? &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>Could podcasting get content through the Great Firewall of China? &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote a couple of pieces last week about Google&#8217;s Internet censorship in China and the debate continues this week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote a couple of pieces last week about Google&#8217;s Internet censorship in China and the debate continues this week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google founder defends censorship &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Google founder defends censorship &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>[...] David Kirkpatrick of Fortune met with Sergey Brin (one of the co-founders of Google) at the World Economic Forum at Davos and asked him about Google&#8217;s decision to censor the Internet in China (something I posted about the other day). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Kirkpatrick of Fortune met with Sergey Brin (one of the co-founders of Google) at the World Economic Forum at Davos and asked him about Google&#8217;s decision to censor the Internet in China (something I posted about the other day). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>I've already read a lot of that. On the one hand I can see how they may wish to argue about the data, but on the other I am all too aware of their love of headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve already read a lot of that. On the one hand I can see how they may wish to argue about the data, but on the other I am all too aware of their love of headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4051</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4051</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That was a PR ploy&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don't think so - read the Danny Sullivan article and John Battelle's articles on this and you'll see it is more to do with not wanting to lose control of sensitive data and Google will fight tooth and nail not to have to 'play ball' on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That was a PR ploy</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so - read the Danny Sullivan article and John Battelle&#8217;s articles on this and you&#8217;ll see it is more to do with not wanting to lose control of sensitive data and Google will fight tooth and nail not to have to &#8216;play ball&#8217; on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4050</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4050</guid>
		<description>That was a PR ploy. They knew they'd have to play ball eventually</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a PR ploy. They knew they&#8217;d have to play ball eventually</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>You would imagine that the US market is rather large too - however that didn't stop Google refusing to hand over files to the US Department of Justice when subpoenaed to do so - despite suffering a fall on Wall Street for so doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would imagine that the US market is rather large too - however that didn&#8217;t stop Google refusing to hand over files to the US Department of Justice when subpoenaed to do so - despite suffering a fall on Wall Street for so doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4046</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4046</guid>
		<description>Everything. Google has to make money. The Chinese market is huge and their competitors are already in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything. Google has to make money. The Chinese market is huge and their competitors are already in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A company that is trading has to answer to its shareholders&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Ok. And the relevance of that comment to this post is what exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A company that is trading has to answer to its shareholders</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok. And the relevance of that comment to this post is what exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>Hardly surprising.. A company that is trading has to answer to its shareholders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly surprising.. A company that is trading has to answer to its shareholders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4012</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-censors-the-internet/#comment-4012</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Don&#8217;t bother searching for &#8220;Tianenmen Square&#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;

	As many expected, Google has launched a Chinese version of its search engine (NYT link) in an attempt to grow in that massive market, and to compete with local search providers such as Baidu.com, and it has agreed to filter its results to comply with ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Don&#8217;t bother searching for &#8220;Tianenmen Square&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>	As many expected, Google has launched a Chinese version of its search engine (NYT link) in an attempt to grow in that massive market, and to compete with local search providers such as Baidu.com, and it has agreed to filter its results to comply with &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
