<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google founder defends censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: China blocks Technorati &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-8454</link>
		<dc:creator>China blocks Technorati &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-8454</guid>
		<description>[...] I have posted about this topic in the past and, in my naive opinion, unless all the search engines come together to formulate a common China strategy, China will continue to pick them off one by one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have posted about this topic in the past and, in my naive opinion, unless all the search engines come together to formulate a common China strategy, China will continue to pick them off one by one. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could podcasting get content through the Great Firewall of China? &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>Could podcasting get content through the Great Firewall of China? &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote a couple of pieces last week about Google&#8217;s Internet censorship in China and the debate continues this week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote a couple of pieces last week about Google&#8217;s Internet censorship in China and the debate continues this week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prying1</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4177</link>
		<dc:creator>prying1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4177</guid>
		<description>I think it is sad that Google will bend their scruples for a ruthless murderous foriegn government yet when people complain about results with the word Jew or baby Jesus no steps are taken. Just excuses!

 - One thing I found with the baby Jesus line comes up with the same #1 link in both .cn and .com - Wonder if the Chinese Govt. will complain and get results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is sad that Google will bend their scruples for a ruthless murderous foriegn government yet when people complain about results with the word Jew or baby Jesus no steps are taken. Just excuses!</p>
<p> - One thing I found with the baby Jesus line comes up with the same #1 link in both .cn and .com - Wonder if the Chinese Govt. will complain and get results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lar Veale</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4175</link>
		<dc:creator>Lar Veale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4175</guid>
		<description>Oops last link should be: 
&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&#38;q=tiananmen%20square&#38;spell=1&#38;sa=N&#38;tab=wi"&gt;www.google.com/images?hl=en&#38;q=tiananmen%20square&#38;spell=1&#38;sa=N&#38;tab=wi&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops last link should be:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=tiananmen%20square&amp;spell=1&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi">http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;q=tiananmen%20square&amp;spell=1&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lar Veale</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4174</link>
		<dc:creator>Lar Veale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4174</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.northcircle.com/?p=16"&gt;Spot the difference&lt;/a&gt; (link shows the first image displayed when searching &lt;a href="http://images.google.cn/images?hl=zh-CN&#38;q=tiananmen%20square&#38;sa=N&#38;tab=wi"&gt;google.cn&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a&gt;"&#62;google.com&lt;/a&gt; for "Tianamen Square").

&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; I think I'll skip the Beijing Olympics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.northcircle.com/?p=16">Spot the difference</a> (link shows the first image displayed when searching <a href="http://images.google.cn/images?hl=zh-CN&amp;q=tiananmen%20square&amp;sa=N&amp;tab=wi">google.cn</a> and <a>&#8220;&gt;google.com</a> for &#8220;Tianamen Square&#8221;).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> I think I&#8217;ll skip the Beijing Olympics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4092</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4092</guid>
		<description>It is called profiteering Alan.

Google are the ones who claim their motto is "Do no evil" - obviously they need to add an addendum - "Do no evil - unless it interferes with plans to make a profit, then work away with evilness"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is called profiteering Alan.</p>
<p>Google are the ones who claim their motto is &#8220;Do no evil&#8221; - obviously they need to add an addendum - &#8220;Do no evil - unless it interferes with plans to make a profit, then work away with evilness&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4090</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan O'Rourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4090</guid>
		<description>But it is not Googles job. The very fact Google are allowed in at all is a small move forward. Change is slow. Even slower for a country of that size. At the end of the day real change only comes from within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it is not Googles job. The very fact Google are allowed in at all is a small move forward. Change is slow. Even slower for a country of that size. At the end of the day real change only comes from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4084</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4084</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is China part of the UN?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Umm yes, in fact they have a permanent seat on the security council making them one of its most powerful members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is China part of the UN?</p></blockquote>
<p>Umm yes, in fact they have a permanent seat on the security council making them one of its most powerful members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4083</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan O'Rourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4083</guid>
		<description>It is a bit. Is China part of the UN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a bit. Is China part of the UN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>Alan,

this isn't about laws but about human rights as laid down bt the UN's &lt;a href="http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html"&gt;Universal Declaration of Human Rights&lt;/a&gt; (specifically articles 18 and 19).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>this isn&#8217;t about laws but about human rights as laid down bt the UN&#8217;s <a href="http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html">Universal Declaration of Human Rights</a> (specifically articles 18 and 19).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan O'Rourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-founder-defends-censorship/#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>I don't think this has anything to do with Google at all. If you want to get your product or service into a country you have to abide by their laws. We would expect the same of a person, company or product coming to our shore.

The issue of censorship and its solution lies with the people of china. 

The banding together of search engines to fight china will do nothing as China already has its own search engines. Google and the like, if entering china, are actually playing catch-up to the leading Chinese engines. They are the little guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this has anything to do with Google at all. If you want to get your product or service into a country you have to abide by their laws. We would expect the same of a person, company or product coming to our shore.</p>
<p>The issue of censorship and its solution lies with the people of china. </p>
<p>The banding together of search engines to fight china will do nothing as China already has its own search engines. Google and the like, if entering china, are actually playing catch-up to the leading Chinese engines. They are the little guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
