<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google get asinine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Grogan</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-52981</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Grogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-52981</guid>
		<description>Tom it's just normal business practices, every business if they are successful will have to do this at one point or another, thats because if you do not protect your mark, you lose it. Look what happend to hoover, xerox etc. Google does not want that, which seems 100% fair to me... Brand means everything unfortunately!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom it&#8217;s just normal business practices, every business if they are successful will have to do this at one point or another, thats because if you do not protect your mark, you lose it. Look what happend to hoover, xerox etc. Google does not want that, which seems 100% fair to me&#8230; Brand means everything unfortunately!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Music Recommendations for my impending trip</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51710</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Music Recommendations for my impending trip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51710</guid>
		<description>[...] Currently I&#8217;m liking Cold War Kids, Sebastien Schulder, Hanne Hukkelberg, Girl Talk, Midlake and Cast King. Just got Tom Waits&#8217; new triple album too. If anyone can recommend anything else then I might Google Checkout it on iTunes before I head to the states.  blogs ireland irish irishblogs music [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Currently I&#8217;m liking Cold War Kids, Sebastien Schulder, Hanne Hukkelberg, Girl Talk, Midlake and Cast King. Just got Tom Waits&#8217; new triple album too. If anyone can recommend anything else then I might Google Checkout it on iTunes before I head to the states.  blogs ireland irish irishblogs music [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51706</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51706</guid>
		<description>Scott, I can't see Coke hurting over what people down south call soda. Most people over here say photocopy not Xerox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I can&#8217;t see Coke hurting over what people down south call soda. Most people over here say photocopy not Xerox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51459</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 10:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51459</guid>
		<description>Uh oh Roger - The Google lawyers are even now en route with a raft of documents to sue your ass and keep you in court for the next 10 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh Roger - The Google lawyers are even now en route with a raft of documents to sue your ass and keep you in court for the next 10 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51400</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51400</guid>
		<description>Half the world seems to have over-reacted to this.  I don't blame Google at all and I thought the post was rather light-hearted.

If you wanna see "evil" visit http://www.adobe.com/misc/trade.html#photoshop

Although I can't blame Adobe either. Trademarks are very valuable commodities.

Any soft drink in the Southern US is often just "a Coke".

Nobody says Petroleum Jelly (even if it's not Vaseline Brand).

Want to make a copy of that document. Go "Xerox" it.

More often than not people refer to bandages as "Band-Aids".

So all those businesses have effectively lost their trademarks.  Some companies spend a fortune just coming up with one only to see it vanish in this manner.

It's all about Trademarks. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half the world seems to have over-reacted to this.  I don&#8217;t blame Google at all and I thought the post was rather light-hearted.</p>
<p>If you wanna see &#8220;evil&#8221; visit <a href="http://www.adobe.com/misc/trade.html#photoshop" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/misc/trade.html#photoshop</a></p>
<p>Although I can&#8217;t blame Adobe either. Trademarks are very valuable commodities.</p>
<p>Any soft drink in the Southern US is often just &#8220;a Coke&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nobody says Petroleum Jelly (even if it&#8217;s not Vaseline Brand).</p>
<p>Want to make a copy of that document. Go &#8220;Xerox&#8221; it.</p>
<p>More often than not people refer to bandages as &#8220;Band-Aids&#8221;.</p>
<p>So all those businesses have effectively lost their trademarks.  Some companies spend a fortune just coming up with one only to see it vanish in this manner.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about Trademarks. <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51091</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-51091</guid>
		<description>I googled "raftery" on Scrudu.ie and you came up first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I googled &#8220;raftery&#8221; on Scrudu.ie and you came up first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50181</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50181</guid>
		<description>It's more a case of Google are too successful. Their full range of products isn't encompassed by 'googling'. They want to make people aware that they offer more products than just the search engine.

It's a dumb way to go about IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more a case of Google are too successful. Their full range of products isn&#8217;t encompassed by &#8216;googling&#8217;. They want to make people aware that they offer more products than just the search engine.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a dumb way to go about IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50135</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50135</guid>
		<description>Donncha and Randy, sure, I know that but the language of Google's post is that you can't even utter "I googled something at Yahoo! the other day" without, as Randy said, the language police storming the premises. Domain names are an entirely different matter.

It is getting ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donncha and Randy, sure, I know that but the language of Google&#8217;s post is that you can&#8217;t even utter &#8220;I googled something at Yahoo! the other day&#8221; without, as Randy said, the language police storming the premises. Domain names are an entirely different matter.</p>
<p>It is getting ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Blandford</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50132</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Blandford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50132</guid>
		<description>I can see why they need to protect it!

Thermos, Hoover, etc. have completely lost their brand identity.

If thermos advertise "Buy a Thermos Flask", you would buy any brand, not a 'thermos'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see why they need to protect it!</p>
<p>Thermos, Hoover, etc. have completely lost their brand identity.</p>
<p>If thermos advertise &#8220;Buy a Thermos Flask&#8221;, you would buy any brand, not a &#8216;thermos&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50090</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50090</guid>
		<description>Here come the lawyers. Google has to do this in order to ensure their trademark down the road. I'm pretty sure their won't be language police after me for use google to describe searching on Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here come the lawyers. Google has to do this in order to ensure their trademark down the road. I&#8217;m pretty sure their won&#8217;t be language police after me for use google to describe searching on Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50019</link>
		<dc:creator>Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50019</guid>
		<description>Another Google hack, perhaps?? Anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Google hack, perhaps?? Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50002</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-get-asinine/#comment-50002</guid>
		<description>It's all about the trademark I'm afraid. The same has happened with people using WordPress in domain names recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the trademark I&#8217;m afraid. The same has happened with people using WordPress in domain names recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
