<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google to store your data encrypted?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6239</guid>
		<description>Simon - fyi - I have it from another legal source that he *thinks* you can only be compelled to hand over keys or passphrases for encrypted information by court order in a non-criminal setting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon - fyi - I have it from another legal source that he *thinks* you can only be compelled to hand over keys or passphrases for encrypted information by court order in a non-criminal setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6158</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6158</guid>
		<description>And if the info is encrypted - can you be compelled to provide the key?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if the info is encrypted - can you be compelled to provide the key?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon McGarr</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6155</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon McGarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6155</guid>
		<description>Oh, and by the way, your call history, and a record of your physical location for the last few years is &lt;a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/"&gt;already stored on the government's behalf by your mobile phone company&lt;/a&gt;.

They don't need a warrant to get at that, either. They just ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and by the way, your call history, and a record of your physical location for the last few years is <a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2005/10/25/parliamentary-question-on-data-retention/">already stored on the government&#8217;s behalf by your mobile phone company</a>.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t need a warrant to get at that, either. They just ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon McGarr</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon McGarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6154</guid>
		<description>Warrant focus on physical invasion. 
Information held digitally isn't generally recognised as a physical item. Therefore accessing it isn't covered by the same protection as your house, or even other physical assests. 

Have I mentioned that &lt;a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/support/"&gt;Digital Rights Ireland is accepting donations?&lt;/a&gt; And there are &lt;a href="http://www.runningwithbulls.com/blog/2006/03/07/support-digital-rights-ireland-buy-a-t-shirt/"&gt;T-shirts available&lt;/a&gt; if you like to get something to tell other people about DRI as well. 

*cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warrant focus on physical invasion.<br />
Information held digitally isn&#8217;t generally recognised as a physical item. Therefore accessing it isn&#8217;t covered by the same protection as your house, or even other physical assests. </p>
<p>Have I mentioned that <a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/support/">Digital Rights Ireland is accepting donations?</a> And there are <a href="http://www.runningwithbulls.com/blog/2006/03/07/support-digital-rights-ireland-buy-a-t-shirt/">T-shirts available</a> if you like to get something to tell other people about DRI as well. </p>
<p>*cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6153</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6153</guid>
		<description>@Derek, I think you are spot on with the Gdrive analysis - Google do want to give you as many ways as possible to store everything online. And while this is very convenient, I'd prefer to see this done using PKI encryption - this would mean no-one could acces my information on Google's servers (Google included) except me. Not likely to happen, but that's what I'd like to see - no evil and all that!

@ Simon - You are kidding, right? The police can examine the contents of my laptop without a warrant if it is not in my house? Can they also examine my car, my luggage, my wallet, my mobile (with all its records of SMSs, address book, call records, etc.)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Derek, I think you are spot on with the Gdrive analysis - Google do want to give you as many ways as possible to store everything online. And while this is very convenient, I&#8217;d prefer to see this done using PKI encryption - this would mean no-one could acces my information on Google&#8217;s servers (Google included) except me. Not likely to happen, but that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d like to see - no evil and all that!</p>
<p>@ Simon - You are kidding, right? The police can examine the contents of my laptop without a warrant if it is not in my house? Can they also examine my car, my luggage, my wallet, my mobile (with all its records of SMSs, address book, call records, etc.)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon McGarr</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6152</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon McGarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6152</guid>
		<description>Hello Tom,

Had a bit of a headscratch about this, and consulted with knowledgable sorts. 

A warrant is required to physically enter your premises. But if your laptop was in for repairs, let's say, and therefore out of your house the collective headscratchers can't see any reason that the police would need a warrant to examine the contents of your PC.

If any of your readers have a legal citation that would suggest otherwise, I'd be very interested in it. 
S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Tom,</p>
<p>Had a bit of a headscratch about this, and consulted with knowledgable sorts. </p>
<p>A warrant is required to physically enter your premises. But if your laptop was in for repairs, let&#8217;s say, and therefore out of your house the collective headscratchers can&#8217;t see any reason that the police would need a warrant to examine the contents of your PC.</p>
<p>If any of your readers have a legal citation that would suggest otherwise, I&#8217;d be very interested in it.<br />
S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacManX.com &#187; Blogroll Dive: 3/13/06</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6131</link>
		<dc:creator>MacManX.com &#187; Blogroll Dive: 3/13/06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-6131</guid>
		<description>[...] And, Tom discussed Google&#8217;s recent online offerings and the prospect of being able to store your data on Google&#8217;s servers.      Filed under: Blogs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And, Tom discussed Google&#8217;s recent online offerings and the prospect of being able to store your data on Google&#8217;s servers.      Filed under: Blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>I thought further about this during the day and have changed my opinion (somewhat). I don't think that Google are trying to create an Office killer - although I don't think they have the capability to do so  even if they wanted to. Microsoft have far too much of a head start for that to be feasible.

I think that the recent Google purchases all lead to GDrive. The problem for Google is that unless they help you actually create and maintain content online, you'll have little reason to store it online with them. For Google, the number one task is surely to tie users in more than search alone allows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought further about this during the day and have changed my opinion (somewhat). I don&#8217;t think that Google are trying to create an Office killer - although I don&#8217;t think they have the capability to do so  even if they wanted to. Microsoft have far too much of a head start for that to be feasible.</p>
<p>I think that the recent Google purchases all lead to GDrive. The problem for Google is that unless they help you actually create and maintain content online, you&#8217;ll have little reason to store it online with them. For Google, the number one task is surely to tie users in more than search alone allows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5980</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5980</guid>
		<description>Derek,

I think you are right up to a point - sure all the online apps are missing huge swathes of functionality which is present in MS Office (i.e. inserting a table of contents) - as against that, the online apps have things like online storage, tagging and rss which are not available in standalone apps so you are correct, it is not a fair comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek,</p>
<p>I think you are right up to a point - sure all the online apps are missing huge swathes of functionality which is present in MS Office (i.e. inserting a table of contents) - as against that, the online apps have things like online storage, tagging and rss which are not available in standalone apps so you are correct, it is not a fair comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lawless</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5973</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lawless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5973</guid>
		<description>I don't think anyone can seriously compare Microsoft's Office package with a couple of Ajax applications, most of which are pretty barebones in terms of functionality, user experience, and maturity. 

Comparing something like Word to something like Writely is like comparing an elastic band to a rocket ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can seriously compare Microsoft&#8217;s Office package with a couple of Ajax applications, most of which are pretty barebones in terms of functionality, user experience, and maturity. </p>
<p>Comparing something like Word to something like Writely is like comparing an elastic band to a rocket ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government using computers to spy &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5970</link>
		<dc:creator>Government using computers to spy &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5970</guid>
		<description>[...] Help on Subscribing           &#171; Google to store your data encrypted? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Help on Subscribing           &laquo; Google to store your data encrypted? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5969</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5969</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification Simon.

Am I correct in thinking, though, that a warrant would be required to examine the contents of your pc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification Simon.</p>
<p>Am I correct in thinking, though, that a warrant would be required to examine the contents of your pc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon McGarr</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5968</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon McGarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-to-store-your-data-encrypted/#comment-5968</guid>
		<description>No subpoena is required in Ireland. 
The police need only request, for example, your Gmail inbox contents, and away it goes. 

See the video of TJ's speech at the Dublin Legal Workshop in Trinity recently for more details. Its on the &lt;a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/03/01/government-and-privacy-in-the-digital-age-talk-now-online/"&gt;DRI website&lt;/a&gt;
Start 50ish minutes in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No subpoena is required in Ireland.<br />
The police need only request, for example, your Gmail inbox contents, and away it goes. </p>
<p>See the video of TJ&#8217;s speech at the Dublin Legal Workshop in Trinity recently for more details. Its on the <a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2006/03/01/government-and-privacy-in-the-digital-age-talk-now-online/">DRI website</a><br />
Start 50ish minutes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
