<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Translate writes its own translation engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vertaling</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-117404</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertaling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-117404</guid>
		<description>I also think the Google one is better :)

I use it quite regularly. But I don't think professional translators will be out of a job any time soon. Human language is so complex. But perhaps in the far, far future there will be more possibilities for them to translate faster with the help of programs like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think the Google one is better <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I use it quite regularly. But I don&#8217;t think professional translators will be out of a job any time soon. Human language is so complex. But perhaps in the far, far future there will be more possibilities for them to translate faster with the help of programs like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana Al Essa</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-112942</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana Al Essa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-112942</guid>
		<description>Am not sure how good is this translation as I don't speak Spanish, but I must say that Google is done extremely well with arabic language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am not sure how good is this translation as I don&#8217;t speak Spanish, but I must say that Google is done extremely well with arabic language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111983</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111983</guid>
		<description>Wow, I'm impressed - IMO the google version is quite a bit better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;m impressed - IMO the google version is quite a bit better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111964</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel Fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111964</guid>
		<description>The option to add human input is a big plus - maybe most of us translators will have to start looking for alternative sources of income in the near future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The option to add human input is a big plus - maybe most of us translators will have to start looking for alternative sources of income in the near future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoin O Lachtnain</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111945</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoin O Lachtnain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111945</guid>
		<description>One of the drones told me about this product two or three years ago. It's the result of throwing big statistical analysis at a corpus of documents that have been formally translated into a number of languages (French, English and Chinese is where they started). There was an academic paper about this resulting from some competition they entered. Apparently the Google system is particularly strong compared to the rest of the field as regards Chinese. I am not in a position to comment on whether this is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the drones told me about this product two or three years ago. It&#8217;s the result of throwing big statistical analysis at a corpus of documents that have been formally translated into a number of languages (French, English and Chinese is where they started). There was an academic paper about this resulting from some competition they entered. Apparently the Google system is particularly strong compared to the rest of the field as regards Chinese. I am not in a position to comment on whether this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111931</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/google-translate-writes-its-own-translation-engine/#comment-111931</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems to me the Google one is a little bit better than the systrans. Have you asked at home? ;)
Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems to me the Google one is a little bit better than the systrans. Have you asked at home? <img src='http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
