<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s windfall for copyright claimants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes it pays to listen at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-51488</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes it pays to listen at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-51488</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote, shortly after Google bought YouTube, that this purchase was a potential windfall for YouTube copyright claimants however recent happenings are proving me wrong (imagine that!). Prof Tim Wu (Professor of Law at Columbia) wrote recently in an article in Slate that YouTube (or GooTube as people are now taking to calling it): is in much better legal shape than anyone seems to want to accept. The site enjoys a strong legal &#8220;safe harbor,&#8221; a law largely respected by the television and film industries for the choices it gives them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote, shortly after Google bought YouTube, that this purchase was a potential windfall for YouTube copyright claimants however recent happenings are proving me wrong (imagine that!). Prof Tim Wu (Professor of Law at Columbia) wrote recently in an article in Slate that YouTube (or GooTube as people are now taking to calling it): is in much better legal shape than anyone seems to want to accept. The site enjoys a strong legal &#8220;safe harbor,&#8221; a law largely respected by the television and film industries for the choices it gives them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Jive Interests &#187; GooTube Squeezes Techmeme&#8217;s Juice For All To See</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39486</link>
		<dc:creator>Deep Jive Interests &#187; GooTube Squeezes Techmeme&#8217;s Juice For All To See</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39486</guid>
		<description>[...] Tom Raftery / Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views:  Google&#8217;s windfall for copyright claimants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tom Raftery / Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views:  Google&#8217;s windfall for copyright claimants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39472</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39472</guid>
		<description>D'oh!

that hadn't occurred to me Simon - well done for spotting that gaping maw in my argument!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;oh!</p>
<p>that hadn&#8217;t occurred to me Simon - well done for spotting that gaping maw in my argument!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39403</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 12:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/googles-windfall-for-copyright-claimants/#comment-39403</guid>
		<description>But are they also getting googles big legal team  against them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But are they also getting googles big legal team  against them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
