<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity disorder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17470</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17470</guid>
		<description>And that's the thing. We could have federated identity before the end of the year if the megalopolis sized web services sites such as Google, Amazon, Yahoo, Microsoft agreed on a standard. With that volume of users everyone else would have to jump on the bandwagon or risk being left out in the cold.

The large players in the financial services sector have federated identity cracked as it's in their interests to be able to rapidly move money about the place and share fraud information  amongst each other. The web/tech companies on the other hand are too afraid of handing a rival access to their customers (Most of whom are mutual customers in some sense anyway) so we're drowning in a sea of username/password combinations and deleting spam/phising emails like there's no tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that&#8217;s the thing. We could have federated identity before the end of the year if the megalopolis sized web services sites such as Google, Amazon, Yahoo, Microsoft agreed on a standard. With that volume of users everyone else would have to jump on the bandwagon or risk being left out in the cold.</p>
<p>The large players in the financial services sector have federated identity cracked as it&#8217;s in their interests to be able to rapidly move money about the place and share fraud information  amongst each other. The web/tech companies on the other hand are too afraid of handing a rival access to their customers (Most of whom are mutual customers in some sense anyway) so we&#8217;re drowning in a sea of username/password combinations and deleting spam/phising emails like there&#8217;s no tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17415</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17415</guid>
		<description>I'm still a big fan of what Dick Hardt is trying to do with sxip and sxore but they seem to be falling down on delivery and buzz. If you looks at the constant stream of information and releases from the ClaimID guys and the buzz around them compared to the silence from sxore since April, it does look like all the sxore energy is gone. 

I had a few issues with sxore which I was told would all be dealt with quickly (full export back to wordpress, recent-comments feature) but I have heard nothing in a very long time. I am very close to dumping it and writing my own exporter on the data. For a company run by a guy who delivers the worlds best presentations, it is very surprising how poor they are at getting their message out.

As for InfoCard/CardSpace, you forget that this is the new Microsoft and they are actively encouraging other implementations of their open standard including Opensource and Mac. 

It is an interesting world we live in where in the space of a year due to the efforts of Robert Scoble and Kim, Microsoft are now seen as a company which "gets" openness and standards as being good for business. Unfortunately, the boys in Google have decided that Microsofts's old business model is now a good fit for them. It really does seem to me that unless we keep our wits about us we'll all just end up owned by Google rather than owned by Microsoft. The only thing saving us now is Google's cack-handed implementations of everything except Search, AdSense/Adwords and GMail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still a big fan of what Dick Hardt is trying to do with sxip and sxore but they seem to be falling down on delivery and buzz. If you looks at the constant stream of information and releases from the ClaimID guys and the buzz around them compared to the silence from sxore since April, it does look like all the sxore energy is gone. </p>
<p>I had a few issues with sxore which I was told would all be dealt with quickly (full export back to wordpress, recent-comments feature) but I have heard nothing in a very long time. I am very close to dumping it and writing my own exporter on the data. For a company run by a guy who delivers the worlds best presentations, it is very surprising how poor they are at getting their message out.</p>
<p>As for InfoCard/CardSpace, you forget that this is the new Microsoft and they are actively encouraging other implementations of their open standard including Opensource and Mac. </p>
<p>It is an interesting world we live in where in the space of a year due to the efforts of Robert Scoble and Kim, Microsoft are now seen as a company which &#8220;gets&#8221; openness and standards as being good for business. Unfortunately, the boys in Google have decided that Microsofts&#8217;s old business model is now a good fit for them. It really does seem to me that unless we keep our wits about us we&#8217;ll all just end up owned by Google rather than owned by Microsoft. The only thing saving us now is Google&#8217;s cack-handed implementations of everything except Search, AdSense/Adwords and GMail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17364</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17364</guid>
		<description>Federated identity is a business issue, not an IT issue. We have the technology, just not the trust between organisations we need to be federation members in order to make it ubiquitous.

And it's all about trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federated identity is a business issue, not an IT issue. We have the technology, just not the trust between organisations we need to be federation members in order to make it ubiquitous.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s all about trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoin O Lachtnain</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17358</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoin O Lachtnain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17358</guid>
		<description>Hey, I know, let's start a metaidentity site - a single location to connect together all the other identity players! Presumably they have an open API? I mean, it would be a poor show for them if they didn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I know, let&#8217;s start a metaidentity site - a single location to connect together all the other identity players! Presumably they have an open API? I mean, it would be a poor show for them if they didn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17302</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17302</guid>
		<description>That reminds me Conor, I signed up with sxip (in order that I could leave a comment on your blog - no idea what those details for that ID are now!).

Ummm, being that I am Mac based, I don't see myself having an InfoCard solution too soon.

I have been chasing Kim for some time now for a PodLeaders podcast. He has agreed to do one, it is simply a matter of scheduling (I hope!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me Conor, I signed up with sxip (in order that I could leave a comment on your blog - no idea what those details for that ID are now!).</p>
<p>Ummm, being that I am Mac based, I don&#8217;t see myself having an InfoCard solution too soon.</p>
<p>I have been chasing Kim for some time now for a PodLeaders podcast. He has agreed to do one, it is simply a matter of scheduling (I hope!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17299</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 14:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/identity-disorder/#comment-17299</guid>
		<description>It is early days and so there are a lot of players jostling for position. Give it a year and there will only be two or three with any traction. 

I've signed up with sxip and PIP and will be leaving it at that for the moment. I guess we'll all end up with InfoCards next year if Kim Cameron has anything to do with it.

It still beats the 400 or so Username/Passwords I have stored in eWallet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is early days and so there are a lot of players jostling for position. Give it a year and there will only be two or three with any traction. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve signed up with sxip and PIP and will be leaving it at that for the moment. I guess we&#8217;ll all end up with InfoCards next year if Kim Cameron has anything to do with it.</p>
<p>It still beats the 400 or so Username/Passwords I have stored in eWallet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
