<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft becoming more open?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: EWI</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>EWI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=497#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Tom, I fully expect there to be a significant sting in the tail on both these for competitors. Just how many times have we seen Microsoft pull this exact same trick over the years? When do they start losing the benefit of the doubt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I fully expect there to be a significant sting in the tail on both these for competitors. Just how many times have we seen Microsoft pull this exact same trick over the years? When do they start losing the benefit of the doubt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Page</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=497#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft to standardize office format&lt;/strong&gt;

	As I guy who works in the busines of public relations, Iam struggling to figure out why NextPage came out with an announcement that it is working with Microsoft to standardize the Office format. 
	Hello! This was the day before the launch of the XBOX ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft to standardize office format</strong></p>
<p>	As I guy who works in the busines of public relations, Iam struggling to figure out why NextPage came out with an announcement that it is working with Microsoft to standardize the Office format.<br />
	Hello! This was the day before the launch of the XBOX &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=497#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>I think opening the Office format will be great - aside from providing us with greater choice (Pages / Keynote / Open Office), think of the benefits to 3rd world countries that can't afford Office but need to use the documents. 

I posted on it &lt;a href="http://http://www.bdminnovate.com/journal/2005/11/22/ms-to-open-office-file-formats-3rd-world-rejoice/"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think opening the Office format will be great - aside from providing us with greater choice (Pages / Keynote / Open Office), think of the benefits to 3rd world countries that can&#8217;t afford Office but need to use the documents. </p>
<p>I posted on it <a href="http://http://www.bdminnovate.com/journal/2005/11/22/ms-to-open-office-file-formats-3rd-world-rejoice/"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostyle</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-becoming-more-open/#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>hostyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/?p=497#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>The licensing is still not compatible with the GPL, so don't expect SSE to be incorporated in any of the major OSS blogging / RSS tools.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#OtherLicenses

"Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license

This is a copyleft free license meant for artistic works and entertainment works. Please don't use it for software or documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The licensing is still not compatible with the GPL, so don&#8217;t expect SSE to be incorporated in any of the major OSS blogging / RSS tools.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#OtherLicenses">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#OtherLicenses</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license</p>
<p>This is a copyleft free license meant for artistic works and entertainment works. Please don&#8217;t use it for software or documentation, since it is incompatible with the GNU GPL and with the GNU FDL.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
