Comments on: Microsoft Web 2.0 presentation http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/ Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:02:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Tom Raftery http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-101244 Tom Raftery Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:26:40 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-101244 Tamiraa, Unfortunately I can't release the presentation. I signed a non-disclosure agreement with Microsoft which doesn't allow me to release it. Sorry. Tamiraa,

Unfortunately I can’t release the presentation. I signed a non-disclosure agreement with Microsoft which doesn’t allow me to release it.

Sorry.

]]> By: Tamiraa http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-101212 Tamiraa Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:20:12 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-101212 hi give me web 2.0 presentation. I student of Mongolia. hi give me web 2.0 presentation.
I student of Mongolia.

]]> By: I slapped Microsoft in the face (and lived to tell the tale!) » at Tom Raftery’s I.T. views http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-31407 I slapped Microsoft in the face (and lived to tell the tale!) » at Tom Raftery’s I.T. views Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:16:40 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-31407 [...] I went to the Microsoft internal management meeting in Switzerland (Bürgenstock - a beautiful resort overlooking Lake Lucerne), told them their web 2.0 offerings sucked, and why. [...] [...] I went to the Microsoft internal management meeting in Switzerland (Bürgenstock - a beautiful resort overlooking Lake Lucerne), told them their web 2.0 offerings sucked, and why. [...]

]]> By: Jeremiah Owyang http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23385 Jeremiah Owyang Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:07:12 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23385 No great insights here. I'm watching with great interest the changes that the open web is having on accesibility and availability of some of Microsoft's greatest office applications --now being offered for free or low cost over browsers. I'm curious to see how Microsoft will react, as things decentralize from the desktop to the browser. No great insights here.

I’m watching with great interest the changes that the open web is having on accesibility and availability of some of Microsoft’s greatest office applications –now being offered for free or low cost over browsers.

I’m curious to see how Microsoft will react, as things decentralize from the desktop to the browser.

]]> By: keith bohanna http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23309 keith bohanna Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:44:00 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23309 Great opportunity Tom - well done! keith Great opportunity Tom - well done!

keith

]]> By: PaulSweeney http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23289 PaulSweeney Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:11:36 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/microsoft-web-20-presentation/#comment-23289 Tom, would be interested to know what lessons people feel they have learned from the passport and .Net initiatives, and how this will inform their 2.0. I must say when I looked into Office Live 2.0 all I saw was a "broadvision-type" story: real office should look to be the "plug in/ widget" capital of the internet, drag and drop any word-type programme, put in what every blog programme/ interface you want, just make MS Live your management and presentation central. Once all the apps are in the one place, then you are in a postion to "make offers" because you can see how people are using the applications. I mean if all your blog stats, phone numbers, and podcasts were managed from MS there is a chance you would retain the position of "Outlook Central". Google are doing this with their analytics and Adsence integration, and all your account stuff in the one place. Is MS going to follow this line, only later, and older? I guess this thinking is informed by mySpace as a giant marketing cluster analysis programme (which is what it will become). Without a view on "micro-use" how can they make "micro-offers" for business users etc. Just a thought. Tom, would be interested to know what lessons people feel they have learned from the passport and .Net initiatives, and how this will inform their 2.0.

I must say when I looked into Office Live 2.0 all I saw was a “broadvision-type” story: real office should look to be the “plug in/ widget” capital of the internet, drag and drop any word-type programme, put in what every blog programme/ interface you want, just make MS Live your management and presentation central. Once all the apps are in the one place, then you are in a postion to “make offers” because you can see how people are using the applications. I mean if all your blog stats, phone numbers, and podcasts were managed from MS there is a chance you would retain the position of “Outlook Central”. Google are doing this with their analytics and Adsence integration, and all your account stuff in the one place. Is MS going to follow this line, only later, and older?

I guess this thinking is informed by mySpace as a giant marketing cluster analysis programme (which is what it will become).

Without a view on “micro-use” how can they make “micro-offers” for business users etc. Just a thought.

]]>