<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jetsons ride again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/the-jetsons-ride-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/the-jetsons-ride-again/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Not a Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/the-jetsons-ride-again/#comment-50150</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/?p=43#comment-50150</guid>
		<description>Hi
Just to set the record straight. None of these flying cars has ever flown off of it's 50 foot safety tether.  So, none of them has ever been tested vs. a helicopter, or anything else.  The latest vehicle, which, by Moller's own admission is underpowered, consumes 80 gal/hour in hover flown unmanned and otherwise unloaded, with 8 gal of fuel on board. (yikes!)
That's way more than a similarly sized piston helicopter, like a Robinson R22, which burns about 11 or the R44, which burns about 16 .  Oh, and the helicopter can actually fly and carry a payload - something the Moller vehicle has yet to do in a  meaningful way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Just to set the record straight. None of these flying cars has ever flown off of it&#8217;s 50 foot safety tether.  So, none of them has ever been tested vs. a helicopter, or anything else.  The latest vehicle, which, by Moller&#8217;s own admission is underpowered, consumes 80 gal/hour in hover flown unmanned and otherwise unloaded, with 8 gal of fuel on board. (yikes!)<br />
That&#8217;s way more than a similarly sized piston helicopter, like a Robinson R22, which burns about 11 or the R44, which burns about 16 .  Oh, and the helicopter can actually fly and carry a payload - something the Moller vehicle has yet to do in a  meaningful way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eligijus Masiulionis</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/the-jetsons-ride-again/#comment-3877</link>
		<dc:creator>Eligijus Masiulionis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/?p=43#comment-3877</guid>
		<description>We do have RAID 1 0 on the DB servers, a live backup running now, and have done a few other things to ensure this wont happen again. The timing was unfortunate because things were still in transition because of the datacenter move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do have RAID 1 0 on the DB servers, a live backup running now, and have done a few other things to ensure this wont happen again. The timing was unfortunate because things were still in transition because of the datacenter move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
