<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikis for quality manual projects?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/</link>
	<description>Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-68528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-68528</guid>
		<description>Take a look at &lt;a href="http://www.blogtronix.com"&gt;Blogtronix&lt;/a&gt;. They have ways of including rudimentary workflows for blog entries which could work, depending on who you are as a user. Five levels of 'membership' so you can really give the approvals process a good twist. What's more, George is very helpful when it comes to mods. 

You could use RSS so that different approvers can see updates through their feeds.

Have you thought about something like &lt;a href="http://www.jotspot.com"&gt;JotSpot&lt;/a&gt;? That has (had) a project management wiki so might be closer to what you're thinking of in terms of document version control? But then you could use Blogtronix to provide a feedback to anyone who is commenting or editing. The net result is the same. It's all in the configuration. 

On balance, I'd take a good look at Blogtronix. They have some of the best of Joomla and Drupal munged together to deliver a pretty good 'out the box' experience. 

Or...how about &lt;a href="http://www.iupload.com"&gt;iUpload?&lt;/a&gt;. They can pull in feeds from all over the place, you just tell it what you want. It can wikify posts - that might be an answer. They too have sophisticated user control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.blogtronix.com">Blogtronix</a>. They have ways of including rudimentary workflows for blog entries which could work, depending on who you are as a user. Five levels of &#8216;membership&#8217; so you can really give the approvals process a good twist. What&#8217;s more, George is very helpful when it comes to mods. </p>
<p>You could use RSS so that different approvers can see updates through their feeds.</p>
<p>Have you thought about something like <a href="http://www.jotspot.com">JotSpot</a>? That has (had) a project management wiki so might be closer to what you&#8217;re thinking of in terms of document version control? But then you could use Blogtronix to provide a feedback to anyone who is commenting or editing. The net result is the same. It&#8217;s all in the configuration. </p>
<p>On balance, I&#8217;d take a good look at Blogtronix. They have some of the best of Joomla and Drupal munged together to deliver a pretty good &#8216;out the box&#8217; experience. </p>
<p>Or&#8230;how about <a href="http://www.iupload.com">iUpload?</a>. They can pull in feeds from all over the place, you just tell it what you want. It can wikify posts - that might be an answer. They too have sophisticated user control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-68140</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-68140</guid>
		<description>Check out &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/"&gt;drupal&lt;/a&gt;, its one of the best  opensource CMS systems out there. You have to host it and it requires PHP + MySQL.

There's a core system and more plugins than you can shake a stick at.

You can &lt;a href="http://www.opensourcecms.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=132"&gt;check it out&lt;/a&gt; in operation, along with a bunch of other open source CMS solutions.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://drupal.org/">drupal</a>, its one of the best  opensource CMS systems out there. You have to host it and it requires PHP + MySQL.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a core system and more plugins than you can shake a stick at.</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://www.opensourcecms.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=132">check it out</a> in operation, along with a bunch of other open source CMS solutions.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67769</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 17:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67769</guid>
		<description>I would suggest defining a document-approval workflow based on tags on the pages, or page categories.  You don't need to require the wiki software support it, when you can define social rules instead.

Ensure you mail page changes to a mailing list, so that you can review these approvals and revert any mistakes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest defining a document-approval workflow based on tags on the pages, or page categories.  You don&#8217;t need to require the wiki software support it, when you can define social rules instead.</p>
<p>Ensure you mail page changes to a mailing list, so that you can review these approvals and revert any mistakes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Raftery</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67629</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Raftery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 11:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67629</guid>
		<description>Thanks Keith - I'll look into that.

Robin - I use Google Docs frequently for collaborating but is there an approvals process in it?

Jim - a wiki is online software which allows anyone to edit a document they are viewing - all through a browser. &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; is the best known example and it defines a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki"&gt;wiki&lt;/a&gt; here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Keith - I&#8217;ll look into that.</p>
<p>Robin - I use Google Docs frequently for collaborating but is there an approvals process in it?</p>
<p>Jim - a wiki is online software which allows anyone to edit a document they are viewing - all through a browser. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page">Wikipedia</a> is the best known example and it defines a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki">wiki</a> here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67550</guid>
		<description>Excuse my ignorance, but just what is a Wikis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse my ignorance, but just what is a Wikis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Blandford</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67544</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Blandford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67544</guid>
		<description>I'd try a collaborating with Google Docs for something like that. It's got pretty good revision history these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d try a collaborating with Google Docs for something like that. It&#8217;s got pretty good revision history these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Gaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67489</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Gaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrafteryit.net/wikis-for-quality-manual-projects/#comment-67489</guid>
		<description>Docuwiki? That's the closest I can think of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Docuwiki? That&#8217;s the closest I can think of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
