Comments on: Windows XP SP 1 - not very secure! http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/ Tom Raftery, social media consultant, speaker, blogger and podcaster Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:55:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: davids brain blog http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-652 davids brain blog Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:49:44 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/#comment-652 <strong>Switching to Firefox alone not enough</strong> Switching to Firefox is no the be all and end all of spyware protection: Alternative browser spyware infects IE When friends ask how to protect against spyware I suggest switching to Firefox, but also to install anti-spyware products and at the very... Switching to Firefox alone not enough

Switching to Firefox is no the be all and end all of spyware protection: Alternative browser spyware infects IE

When friends ask how to protect against spyware I suggest switching to Firefox, but also to install anti-spyware products and at the very…

]]> By: Tom http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-619 Tom Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:09:08 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/#comment-619 Don't forget Keith, I was playing LAN games of Marathon back in 1994 and it was like nothing we'd ever seen before! Don’t forget Keith, I was playing LAN games of Marathon back in 1994 and it was like nothing we’d ever seen before!

]]> By: Keith http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Keith Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:01:40 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/#comment-618 And on the topic of more secure OSs, I downloaded a copy of Basilisk and System 7, and gave Marathon a try seeing as Bungie made them freeware a short while back. Now I realise what you were talking about. They're still bloody good games! And on the topic of more secure OSs, I downloaded a copy of Basilisk and System 7, and gave Marathon a try seeing as Bungie made them freeware a short while back. Now I realise what you were talking about. They’re still bloody good games!

]]> By: Tom http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Tom Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:48:08 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/#comment-611 Feargal, you may well have done. Stories like these are emerging all the time. <blockquote>at least one of them passed the test quite well</blockquote> Even in the story above, XP SP2 only had 16 attacks as opposed to XP SP1's 4857 and SP2 survived all 16 attacks. Maybe this is similar to what you read? Feargal,

you may well have done. Stories like these are emerging all the time.

at least one of them passed the test quite well

Even in the story above, XP SP2 only had 16 attacks as opposed to XP SP1’s 4857 and SP2 survived all 16 attacks.

Maybe this is similar to what you read?

]]> By: fmk http://www.tomrafteryit.net/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/comment-page-1/#comment-608 fmk Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:11:28 +0000 http://www.tomrafteryit.net/views/windows-xp-sp-1-not-very-secure/#comment-608 i seem to recall first reading this story at least a month ago. but in the version i read i thought there was several versions of ms tested and at least one of them passed the test quite well. i seem to recall first reading this story at least a month ago. but in the version i read i thought there was several versions of ms tested and at least one of them passed the test quite well.

]]>